InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 17023
Next 10
Followers 13
Posts 901
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/21/2006

Re: kalrmbs post# 11084

Wednesday, 08/02/2006 12:35:17 PM

Wednesday, August 02, 2006 12:35:17 PM

Post# of 17023
My take after skimming the doc is based on some footnotes:

pdf pg 115 footnote 624 suggests that the DDR rate was 'not reasonable' since it was above that they asked for RDRAM, which is stated as 1-2%

pdf pg 114 footnote 621 (paraphrase) 'although we do not find .. monopoly power over DDR2 ...., we do not rule it out'

IMO, these mean that:
i) a royalty rate of 1-2% would be what they are looking for as an outcome
ii) they reserve the right to add DDR2 (and likely all other subsequent products)

Would like to hear other opinions.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RMBS News