InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,431.60
(
-0.04%
)
US TECH 100
19,168.00
(
0.52%
)
Dow Jones
38,589.16
(
-0.15%
)
Brent Oil
82.28
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
66,212.16
(
0.31%
)
Post# of 104461
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

dms1

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 3
Posts 1005
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/20/2012

dms1

Re: RPR post# 50137

Tuesday, 07/12/2016 12:58:45 PM

Tuesday, July 12, 2016 12:58:45 PM

Post# of 104461
Could you post any confirmation that Samsung ever said anything about the quality of Nanoco's product? As I recall from that time, and a quick search confirms, Nanoco thought they had a deal with Samsung which was a main reason Dow built their plant in South Korea, but they were unable to come to financial terms so Samsung decided to make them in house with patents from Nanosys. Samsung didn't seem to have any problem with the product, but they didn't want to pay Dow's price
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up