InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 183
Posts 41448
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 03/21/2012

Re: tpecj post# 163442

Monday, 07/11/2016 5:56:37 PM

Monday, July 11, 2016 5:56:37 PM

Post# of 173212
I heard that.

Speaking of "ginning up" gold, I find a couple things very interesting.

First of all, with all of the data points from the various phases of geochem sampling, the gold and lead anomalies are shown as perfectly circular. Nothing in nature is ever that perfect and symmetric, especially geochem data.

Secondly, the area to the north of the supposed anomaly in Sections 33 and 34 have been mapped and sampled extensively by other explorers over the years, and some interesting gold values have been found all over those hills, even some high grade gold samples in outcrops. Yet, JB does not show that area as even anomalous (strange, huh!?) That would ruin the story of his perfectly circular gold anomaly "centered" only over the porphyry center. When is a bullseye not really a bullseye?

Show the data, JB, and explain to your investors how you came up with those "anomalous" boundaries.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LBSR News