Monday, July 11, 2016 12:33:33 PM
Correct. If it was signed without the consent of the person and filed on his behalf against his wishes and he then died, his estate would have the right to object, assuming the statute of limitations hadn't run and of course assuming they did not want the letter or filing to be submitted. If they did, there is no forgery.
Again, if it was forgery, where was Gouge? And if the Wallaces did not agree, why did they hire a lawyer in DE to obtain the judgment and collect? It is clear the Wallaces agreed with everything in the submission--so there was no forgery and no harm to spencer. He would have been in the exact situation had the Wallaces signed it. That's why the forgery claim is nonsense. spencer suffered no injury because of the signature. Gouge understood this. Hence he never objected. Why not call him and let him explain this to you. I'm done. I will not comment anymore on the absurd claim of forgery.
spencer has zilch. Which is why his lawyers quit. If he had a case, he'd sue in the proper state.
FEATURED DBG Pays Off $1.3 Million in Convertible Notes, which Retires All of the Company's Convertible Notes • Nov 7, 2024 2:16 PM
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q3 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Nov 8, 2024 7:07 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service • SMX • Nov 7, 2024 8:48 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. (OTC: RAKR) Announces Successful Implementation of 1.6 Million Liter Per Day Wastewater Treatment Project in Iraq • RAKR • Nov 7, 2024 8:30 AM
SBC Medical Group Holdings and MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies Announce Business Alliance • SBC • Nov 7, 2024 7:00 AM
VAYK Confirms Insider Buying at Open Market • VAYK • Nov 5, 2024 10:40 AM