Saturday, July 09, 2016 8:49:22 AM
Airene told us before we hired her that Exobox's primary argument would be whether the shareholders met the number of shares to demand a vote.
I suggested we head that whole train off at the pass and submit affidavits of share ownership along with certifying letters from brokerage houses to prove ownership at the time of the first filing of the suit.
The shareholders came through big time with affidavits of shares and brokerage documentation enabling us to file as a group and demand a long overdue vote.
The problem is even after link ng Airenes pockets with cash she never submitted the share certification documentation which allowed Takos to challenge and eventually get our case thrown out.
This was a direct result of sloppy legal work.
The shareholders should be refunded the entire amount wasted on the case.
ALL IMHO. GLTA
FEATURED NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM