OK, thanks Krom. I am familiar...
with the document in your first post, have had it bookmarked since ERHC filed it.
If this is what sneak is basing his theory on, then I see nothing special about September other than it will be the start of the Second Additional Exploration Period, should CEPSA choose to continue. As I mentioned before, continuing would be both good and possibly not so good for ERHC since CEPSA's current known carry obligation has been fulfilled, leaving ERHC responsible for 45% of the cost of anything other than a possible appraisal well.
And any links to where CEPSA discusses delays in paperwork, etc., would still be appreciated.
.
