Whitefish, I'll give you 2 scenarios and tell me which one makes common sense and which one defies common sense.
1. Delgado's contract said he was due shares. Those shares were never expensed. Those shares were never on the books. Starrs knew it. Starrs decided to throw Delgado a bone for hundreds of thousands or 25,000,000 shares and Delgado took it. As a result, there is a confidentiality agreement and Delgado can no longer talk.
or
2. Delgado's contract never called for shares or warrants. Delgado had no salary. Delgado was doing this out of this goodness of his heart. He was working for MyECheck as a charitable contribution. Starrs hates his guts. But, Starrs Just all of a sudden decided to give him 25,000,000 shares.
Now, what scenario do you think makes more sense.
BTW, Fast Eddie's explanation was it's a normal thing.
