Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[Boatswain]

Is Sinclair The archeologist?

Who cares? When you analyze apples and oranges all you get is mixed fruit and nothing else.

First, if it is true what has been posted that Mary stated a permit is in process of being approved then SFRX must have a archeologist in their team. One of the requirements.

And, when writing official correspondence all information is about the main topic. You do not put a subject in the correspondence that is not with in that scope. The letter was about the reports not meeting the State's requirements and the reports are the archeologist responsibility. So I could read this as giving guidance to SFRX on getting assistance.

The attempt to read this as a negative is once again easy to identify. Blending subjects shows this. The slant shows true intention. This happened last Nov. Since then they have submitted new reports, at least 3 if not 4. Who signed these reports will tell you who is currently on staff.

Now as for the report, the State turned over 2600 pages of information to the lawyers for the Defendant. I really think if the reports where not within these 2600 pages SCM would be posting that items were withheld.

I bet the reports do not assist the slant, and that is also why out of the 2600 pages we only see a handful. Must have been really disappointing when reviewing the 2600 pages.