Friday, June 24, 2016 12:29:35 PM
Just because they may have things to deal with doesnt mean just keep him in position and continue to allow him more pay as CEO.
If the CEO of any public company is bad for the company the bod cuts them loose and if they need to deal with legal issues its not done with the person in a place of power or knowledge.
There is no reason AT ALL to keep a crooked CEO on.
As a matter of fact if they have legal issues that all the more reason to remove him.
You dont put a person you are suing in a position to have insider knowledge of the company plan.
There is no justifiable reason to keep a bad ceo.
If all 3 bod members have 1/3 say then
at least 2 out of 3 of the bod here want Scott in charge or he wouldnt be.
You decide which 2
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM
Avant Technologies to Implement AI-Empowered, Zero Trust Architecture in Its Data Centers • AVAI • Apr 29, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • BLO • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM