InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,584.54
(
-0.88%
)
US TECH 100
19,688.00
(
0.05%
)
Dow Jones
39,753.75
(
0.08%
)
Brent Oil
85.37
(
0.30%
)
Bitcoin
57,269.19
(
-0.14%
)
Post# of 8527
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (4) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (4) Next 10 Prev Next

Informer 100

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 5
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/17/2016

Informer 100

Re: MasterBlastr post# 4651

Tuesday, 06/21/2016 11:14:36 PM

Tuesday, June 21, 2016 11:14:36 PM

Post# of 8527
I appreciate your input. But, why wouldn't the company keep shares intact? I understand that is more debt for them, but isn't there some insider ownership as well? Doesn't that also build some credibility for a company that was basically forced into bankruptcy by a lender? Why should shareholders pay for a forced bankruptcy? I am not very familiar with bankruptcy proceedings and law, and would like to learn more about their chances. Thank you
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (4) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (4) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up