InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 12861
Boards Moderated 23
Alias Born 04/16/2001

Re: kbbccandyman post# 24830

Thursday, 06/16/2016 5:22:01 PM

Thursday, June 16, 2016 5:22:01 PM

Post# of 28677
"The folks holding receipts for John Bourque's undisclosed side deals surely must be getting nervous about getting any kind of return from their investment. Soon they will be in the same boat as all the hurting in the dark shareholders."

If the above is an accurate account of how Bourque Industries has been financed since John Bourque's return, then I'm sure each person contacted by Bourque Industries (really the puppets as official representatives of Bourque Industries under the strict "game plan, or con instructions" of John Bourque) fell into three categories: Learned how John Bourque's leadership since 2011 resulted in Bourque Industries to remain to this day, based on BORK's pps, as a failed company and replied "Get Lost." Second, aware of what I just wrote, understood "money is to be made from idiots investing in penny scam companies" and viewed Bourque Industries as just another, so "Lets join this ride and time an exit before we join those that hold & hope to a conclusion of total lost before yet the scam has a rerun." Third, those that understood John Bourque's history since 2011 and decided to join this ride of Bourque Industries having John Bourque return to signal that John Bourque returned to Bourque Industries via his person that proprietary data having ownership of Bourque Industries but seemingly missing during John Bourque's prison stay based on Bourque Industries stagnation and inability to create and further make progress on Kryron alloy research and development that Bourque Industries stated as present prior to John Bourque's removal to prison. So here in this third hypothetical scenario, a possible postulated sequence of events would engage John Bourque's potential to make Bourque Industries a success, and not to as a possible penny scam initiative, but only so if John Bourque's Bourque Industries provides legal binding conditions that this person with obtain certain, not made public but borders on what could be illegal side-deals if the true test of the law was applied, conditions that this person felt protected his direct and undisclosed investment to finance Bourque Industries since John Bourque returned.

Candyman, Could you please post on this board the telephone contact number of the following Bourque Industries Chief Operating Officer as I would like to validate your statement as being true at this time.

(reference) I spoke directly to Robert Callesen about a year ago & at that time he was unaware he was an officer of BORK.

The posts contained on my (gotmilk) account are my own opinions and are not recommendations or advise to buy or sell any security, stocks or other investments. These posts are for entertainment purposes only and are not considered to be facts or truth.

thanks, doug


The posts contained on my (gotmilk) account are my own opinions and are not recommendations or advise to buy or sell any security, stocks or other investments. These posts are for entertainment purposes only and are not considered to be facts or truth.