InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 53
Posts 1787
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/22/2015

Re: dlcullum post# 204125

Thursday, 06/09/2016 9:03:12 PM

Thursday, June 09, 2016 9:03:12 PM

Post# of 403502
This is a trick question.


if the fda gives Sequestox the same approval as PFE's drug (I.e., adt labeling for iv and nasal but not oral), it's not going to help us - we need all 3 adt labels (iv nasal oral) to be profitable.

Right?







SequestOx does prevent oral abuse by chewing/sucking, but it will not have labeling for oral abuse. When the FDA is referring to oral abuse, they are referring to an abuser's ability to tamper with an ER/LA drug and thereby turn it into an immediate-release drug. Since SequestOx is already an immediate-release drug, this question is irrelevant to SequestOx, and an oral abuse label will not even be an option. It will be an extremely relevant question, and a very important part of the ADF label, for ELI-201 and ELI-216, but not IR ELI-200. As far as I'm aware, there were only nasal abuse studies done for ELI-200 (B. Setnik's poster), and I have never seen any oral abuse data for any ELI drug.



"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics."

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ELTP News