InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 182
Posts 41183
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 03/21/2012

Re: None

Wednesday, 06/08/2016 11:32:16 PM

Wednesday, June 08, 2016 11:32:16 PM

Post# of 82575
Correction: Lawsuits.


Case Number

Case

Category

16-GC-00847-S1 PROCUREPAL LLC VS UNITED MOBILE SOLUTIONS GARNISHMENT-FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
16-A-03558-8 URSA INFORMATION SYSTEMS VS UNITED MOBILE SOLUTIONS CONTRACT
16-A-02623-4 NOWACCOUNT NETWORK CORP VS UNITED MOBILE SOLUTIONS ET AL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
16-C-01388-S6 CURVE COMMERCIAL SERVICES VS UNITED MOBILE SOLUTIONS ACCOUNT
16-C-00639-S2 PROCUREPAL VS UNITED MOBILE SOLUTIONS ACCOUNT
13-T-00663 UNITED MOBILE SOLUTIONS



Lots of interesting stuff here: http://www.gwinnettcourts.com/casesearch/advanced.aspx

Looks like four different parties are suing UMS in Gwinnet Co., GA. One of them (Procurepal), is garnishing payments being made by UMS to various banks. I imagine that doesn't make Chase Bank very happy.

It's all good though - UMS has lots of REVENUE!!! LMAO.......

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.