InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 2292
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2015

Re: btm post# 190537

Tuesday, 06/07/2016 3:30:51 AM

Tuesday, June 07, 2016 3:30:51 AM

Post# of 194797
What the do you think I was talking about?

From the PR This decision was made because a license issued in a program deemed unconstitutional appears to hold no intrinsic value.


LOOOOFMAOOO

They are saying the if they won the license though the JR it would have no value to the company BUT a lawsuit does. WOOOW talk about BS.

This also means Bill Chaaban does not have ANY security clearance and never will get it once more as he was in the JR to get the security clearance back.

Oh yah here's the no intrinsic value busted

“It is neither feasible nor appropriate to order the Defendant to reinstate the MMAR (as amended by current jurisprudence),” wrote Phelan. “It is not the role of the Court to impose regulations. The MMAR may be a useful model for subsequent consideration; however, it is not the only model, nor is a MMAR-type regime the only medical marihuana regime, as experience from other countries has shown.”

In a press release, Minister Philpott emphasized that the MMPR remains in force.




https://news.liftcannabis.ca/2016/03/24/allard-mmpr-philpott/

Everything I state is the whole truth and nothing but the truth to me, so help you god if you follow my advice.