InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 2015
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/12/2013

Re: Jayyy post# 5631

Thursday, 06/02/2016 7:20:29 AM

Thursday, June 02, 2016 7:20:29 AM

Post# of 13735
Well, since we are moving on to a new subject, I presume you now agree that there is no issue concerning Compliance with FDA, and I presume you are happy with the wording "appears to be a drug".

ok, on to interstate commerce. As the Sucanon application to sell over the counter as a herbal medication was denied because it appears to be a drug, it follows logically that there cannot be any interstate commerce.

However, the word "banned" is typically used where a company was doing something illegal, got caught, and is now banned. This is not the case with Roth/Sucanon as the company never sold the product in the US or did any interstate commerce. I would suggest that instead of the word "banned" it would be more appropriate to say "interstate commerce is not permitted at this time".