Decision Diagnostics Corp (DECN)

[DrZem]

WOW - I'm amazed at our different perspectives

Do you really believe that the CA case judgements had anything to do with Sherman Act violations. If so, please educate us on how you came to that conclusion.

"I was trying to understand why a case was being pursued in Nevada when the District Court in CA had just signed off on an agreement that basically said the claims and counter-claims in the CA case were to be dropped. Turns out that the counter-claims brought by this company in that case were based on purported Sherman Act violations whereas the NV case is based on patent infringement."

That is the most creative description of the of the 4+ year JNJ siege on DECN I have ever encountered.

The primary case was about JNJ's assertion that DECN had infringed on JNJ patents. The court ruled, that all of the alleged JNJ's patent infringements were invalid. And JNJ appealed multiple times to the highest possible level.

The Nevada case is about DECN's assertion that JNJ is infringing on their patents.

What was your point?