InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2571
Posts 307014
Boards Moderated 29
Alias Born 04/12/2001

Re: lesnshawn post# 10012

Wednesday, 05/25/2016 12:08:03 AM

Wednesday, May 25, 2016 12:08:03 AM

Post# of 10055
That is a description of a reverse triangular merger. No, CCRA did not already own Nate's.

But that is of no importance. Throughout, CCRA was a PUBLIC COMPANY. That is why Nate's wanted to effect the merger.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.