It looks like this original patent covers smart lens that EPGL has been touting including transmitting data through smart case...
I may be mistaken but the original patent that was awarded seems very broad and covers a whole lot of mechanics that may interfere with EPGL's claims.
I think EPGL needs to clarify how different is this from what they are filing. I think the fail notification that was provided seems to use this patent in it's reason for the initial fail notification. I think the subsequent phone interview was to discuss this in detail with the examiner.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.