FutureLand Corp (FUTL)

[Cameron Cox]

Finckus,

I understand why people are upset. But, the facts are the facts. When confronted with a brick wall you can either go over or under I suppose, but you can't generally go through it. To be technical as you are suggesting we be, I don't recall a press release stating that shares would be released with no burden to the shareholder as you say, I don't specifically remember that language...And FWDG issued restricted shares. You say, but I did not know they were going to be. Well neither did I. Still, they happen to be. And when I found out why it was this way it made sense to me which I tried to explain to the shareholders. But this angers some. Ok. I acknowledge that some are angry, and in most cases about most things this is always true, but the company had no liquidity and trigger happy shareholders were, as you no doubt must know, wanting to dump their shares. But it is their right you say...This would have been counter intuitive for the success of the new company. In order to give the new company a fighting chance to do what it needs to do to create a viable business where shareholders can actually make money it was necessary. But, I get it, some of you don't care about that, you just want the value of the dividend shares today. But it is part of my job, however, to care. Now I'm doing what I can to get this first S1 approved so we can do one that will free up the shares. But, it is still more important for the company to thrive and gain ground fiscally than it is to free up the restricted shares in any case. It just is. If we can get the stock to truly be worth something then the people who got "stuck" with the shares may one day be glad they could not sell them early. And this is what we are trying to do. I hear the criticism now hear the rationale. And, finally, if people really really really need them freed up they have rule 144 to rely upon. And people are doing it. Kind Regards,

Cameron