InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 1237
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2015

Re: rrojarom post# 37226

Tuesday, 05/24/2016 2:02:01 PM

Tuesday, May 24, 2016 2:02:01 PM

Post# of 127559
Why would they tweet today's and not the May 10 article? Is it because Tom actually spent the $15,000 to pump the stock? Doesn't seem like his style but who knows. BTW, are you able to figure out why the financials aren't showing any production costs for MoM? Originally it was budgeted at over $2 million. Even with a less costly, lower budget production version it still seems like it would cost in the neighborhood of at least $250k. But I can't seem to find any major production costs on any of the previous financials.

BTW, even though Tom converted some Preferred shares into those 80 million common shares, who knows how many are still left. There were 11,486 Series B preferred stock that could be converted to common at an exchange of 1 preferred for 2.5 million common. So Tom would have only had to convert 32 of those Series B preferred shares to get 80 million common out of the deal. If he converted Series B, he still has 20 million Series C valued at $4 million that he could convert at .20.

This company has become more bloated with stock since we bought in, not less. His PR about decreasing authorized shares was a total smoke and mirrors because after the RS, surprise, we suddenly have 200 million authorized. Before the RS we had about 5 billion. The RS doesn't affect the authorized, however, a 1:500 RS would have meant an equivalent of 10 million authorized after the RS. We now have 20 times that. 200 million.

INMG is turning into a stock creating venture that ONLY benefits Tom.