ok defend away; on one hand company James Tour was involved with a company that was sold......directly involved w/Display Week how?
...on the other, inquiry about Nanoco, (active in Display Week)
and questioned about Mod position, (as if anti-QMC)
....equate those positions w/your comment about all things QD
wrt: " evaluate market, financials, and commercial success to determine what companies we bet and when to sell."
Exactly how many of the companies involved w/QDs at Display Week
have you evaluated their financials, products, and commercial success?
Personally, I think most read about other companies involved w/nanotech. This board is about Quantum Materials Corp,(QTMM).
If other companies are going to be brought into the conversation here, don't you think that one should include their pov and supportive data as to why they think it's relevant?
If you want to make a point about QDs going mainstream, bring it on......if you think the new tech will be competitive; state your case.
