Well, to be honest, the filing of a permit is of such little consequence, I couldn't say for sure I didn't see it. Under what circumstances would an October filing have anything to do with what I have been saying? I see no reason to state what I presume everyone knows, that wells have been permitted and drilled and fracked. Heck, they spudded a well in October. Let me repeat that in full disclosure so everybody knows. Breitling has drilled and completed wells. Should I put that in my signature so no one gets confused?
I don't know, sometimes I do make bad assumptions, like if I am discussing a producing well on this forum, I don't need to spend time telling people that the well was in fact permitted and drilled. But in the interest of full disclosure, your post virtually proves that someone came up with $625.00 to pay the assessment---back in October.
Any particular need to state everything that doesn't have anything to do with my point?
Now what would be interesting is if any of the wells turned out to be any good.
The questions are rhetorical, I know you don't answer questions.
