InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 614
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/03/2014

Re: GURUS post# 14387

Thursday, 05/19/2016 4:19:33 PM

Thursday, May 19, 2016 4:19:33 PM

Post# of 17856
I was hired initially for SMAA in October of 2012 and was told then that I would start out working for SMAA, but everything would be transferred over to DEAC once that stock went live.

I have no idea where you are getting your information, but it's not even close to correct considering the last project I worked on was only 2 months into it - and it was 90% finished at that point. I was waiting on a design from Sarah was all I had left really, but they never made payroll on it or gave me the design they wanted - because they flaked out again.

However, I'm not sure what IT person you could be speaking of since I was told all the other programmers were let go in Feb of 2013 after the first time they missed payroll. It was the only reason I stayed on. The only person I knew of that had any IT experience and was still around was a guy named Tommy, but I have no idea where he lived and never worked with him directly.

Your claims are even more odd since I worked at a much faster speed than the others. I remember they gave me a "test project" when I was being hired, they thought it would take me a week. I finished it in less than an hour. Because I had already done the work in the past and it's the kind of stuff I could do in my sleep.

I came into SMAA with experience in the auto industry. I'd already built an auto lead system that did millions in revenue and lived in the Silicon Valley for 8 years during that time. I've helped develop industry standards for sending leads. Meanwhile, Tony and Sarah couldn't even get in the door with companies that I've had many lunches with over the years.

You'll have to try harder if you want to pretend as though I was the problem at SMAA. There is a reason it only took me about 3 days to find more employment after I quit. I'm real good at what I do and I can do everything(and have for 16 years).