Followers | 404 |
Posts | 58071 |
Boards Moderated | 16 |
Alias Born | 05/01/2010 |
Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:51:24 AM
I was just thinking about the quote recently posted here. "Not unusual for companies to be charged by regulators and if often happens at the behest of those who have large naked short positions"
My question is why an abusive naked shorter who supposedly has a "large" position, would report a company whose stock they're shorting? If the stock of the referenced publicly traded entity were to be revoked, the shorter would lose his entire investment.
Sometimes it's best to use common sense rather than attempting to make silk from a sows ear.
Of course shorting HESG is laughable seeing as how it's already without a bid.
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM