InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 7633
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 09/29/2011

Re: MikeLandfer post# 44938

Monday, 05/16/2016 8:40:29 PM

Monday, May 16, 2016 8:40:29 PM

Post# of 54198
If a manufacturer cannot fulfill demand, that's pretty bad isn't it?? Who picked the manufacturer, who planned for potential demand, and if they didn't anticipate a realistic increase in order size, that's bad.

Let's get real here- this company is (like most penny stocks) eager to release hype which is nothing more than promises & rumours. If there was "a potential new deal" which required a sudden jump in production, OBVIOUSLY a multitude of PRs would have been coming the past 4 months to keep investors stoked.

Also, if the only reason for a switch was an increase in demand, then the old supplier should/would have been left alone to fill partial demand, while a second supplier was found.

Getting 50% of the desired product out the door on time is a hundred times better than getting NOTHING out the door. Only an idiot would increase delays and expense by cancelling an otherwise positive manufacturing agreement which could have given partial fulfillment.

Is the company run by idiots?? If yes, then that's ALSO pretty bad, yes?

There is absolutely no positive-spin scenario for a 'radio-silence-followed-up-by-quiet-announcement-of-logistics-delays' situation.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent DGWR News