From dim memory of the permitting process, an operator submitted a registered surveyors plat , name of well, and total depth. The approved permit was returned with an assigned number identifying the well bore. Responsibility for this identifying number and its legal survey was given to the operator and he was required to erect a sigh with that info on the well bore location. Breitling, possibly a paid up non operating party, had no obligation to furnish any of those requirements. The act of omission by Crude in a PR would stink of misleading investors with the possibility of fraud.or unjust expectations of a massive drilling program beginning. I have seen no reason to expect anything out of this interrelated group of Dallasite playing oilmen but amateurish mistakes camouflaged by defective verbiage. If the Breitling minion could talk a well into performance, they would be a Fortune 500 Company overnight
