InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,288.56
(
0.31%
)
Post# of 63744
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

desie0713

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 1
Posts 56
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2012

desie0713

Re: desie0713 post# 52360

Monday, 05/09/2016 8:46:12 AM

Monday, May 09, 2016 8:46:12 AM

Post# of 63744
I believe our impairment charges related to the excess cost capitalized with namoya and not with the price of gold. there should be no impairment charges going forward (imo) since costs related to namoya are now expensed as opposed to being capitalized. curious as what they used as the price of gold to value their assets!!!
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up