InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,473.23
(
0.77%
)
US TECH 100
19,410.80
(
1.27%
)
Dow Jones
38,778.10
(
0.49%
)
Brent Oil
83.90
(
2.16%
)
Bitcoin
66,590.30
(
-0.07%
)
Post# of 63744
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

ThinkSustain

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 219
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/08/2013

ThinkSustain

Re: nagoya1 post# 52353

Sunday, 05/08/2016 8:33:02 PM

Sunday, May 08, 2016 8:33:02 PM

Post# of 63744
I don't pretend to be knowledgeable on the subject, but I know others here have an better understanding. But, if impairment is an adjustment on the reduced value of reserves due to the lower price of gold, it seems logical that an increase of reserves would reduce the possibility of further impairment charges.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up