![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Thursday, May 05, 2016 12:51:43 PM
I mean ethanol in gasoline is soooooo much worse but no one is causing a stink about that
The problem is everyone wants a short term solution. It is better to use biomass and have plans to back fill those places to absorb the carbon output. It takes a long time. But it is far better than ripping up the earth and pulling deep storage of carbon and emitting it.
Another couple of points. This is taking biomass already destined to be burned and creating syngas to then create fertilizer. Just burning syngas is what is compared in there so called reports. Taking it the step further and using it to speed up or assist in the absorption of carbon by growing plants is the plus here. If you think of all the bio waste that comes from these farms it can easily reduce carbon emissions and keep it in the cycle. Will it be THE answer. Probably not. But it's better than pulling stuff out of the ground.
PickleJar Unveils Latest Venue Managed Services Innovations in Upcoming Webinar • PKLE • Aug 23, 2024 1:11 PM
Element79 Gold Corp Provides Update on Nevada Portfolio • ELMGF • Aug 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Maybacks Adds Award Winning Show to Its Lineup Discusses Maybacks Opportunity • AHRO • Aug 22, 2024 11:30 AM
North Bay Resources Announces First Gold Concentrate at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Assays 12 oz/ton Gold, 17.5 oz/ton Platinum, and 8 oz./ton Silver, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Aug 22, 2024 10:28 AM
All Things Mobile Analytic, Inc. Reports Major Growth with Over $11 Million in Revenue • ATMH • Aug 22, 2024 7:19 AM
Unitronix Announces Strategic Entry into Cryptocurrency Space • UTRX • Aug 21, 2024 10:00 AM