Thursday, May 05, 2016 12:51:43 PM
I mean ethanol in gasoline is soooooo much worse but no one is causing a stink about that
The problem is everyone wants a short term solution. It is better to use biomass and have plans to back fill those places to absorb the carbon output. It takes a long time. But it is far better than ripping up the earth and pulling deep storage of carbon and emitting it.
Another couple of points. This is taking biomass already destined to be burned and creating syngas to then create fertilizer. Just burning syngas is what is compared in there so called reports. Taking it the step further and using it to speed up or assist in the absorption of carbon by growing plants is the plus here. If you think of all the bio waste that comes from these farms it can easily reduce carbon emissions and keep it in the cycle. Will it be THE answer. Probably not. But it's better than pulling stuff out of the ground.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM