Sunday, May 01, 2016 5:51:54 PM
The post I'm replying to said:
"The Court document filed announcing a Settlement ...
Many have reviewed that same document and it seems the consensus,at least on that document,the "105"/En Banc case is not included/or noted as part of this settlement."
I don't understand the point. The document didn't mention anything about the Settlement terms other than they are not public!
Here's a statement that is equally true:
"Many have reviewed that same document and it seems the consensus,at least on that document, is that alien invasion protection or JNJ's request for a full court case ruling is not included/or noted as part of this settlement."
My points are that the terms of the settlement have not been disclosed. And any consensus about the 105 patent is based on speculation without any access to the facts.
FEATURED SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service To Enhance Natural Rubber Industry's Ability to Report on Sustainable and Ethical Supply Chains • Oct 3, 2024 7:00 AM
Basanite, Inc. Appoints Ali Manav as Interim Chief Executive Officer • BASA • Oct 3, 2024 9:15 AM
Integrated Ventures Announces Launch of MedWell Facilities, LLC and Lease Agreement with Giant Fitness Clubs • INTV • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Beyond the Horizon: Innovative Drug Combinations Offer New Hope for Alzheimer's and More • NVS • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Transforming Alzheimer's Treatment: Innovative Combinations to Boost Cognition • PFE • Oct 2, 2024 9:00 AM
Unitronix Corp Unveils Cryptocurrency Investment Portfolio Strategy • UTRX • Oct 2, 2024 8:40 AM