InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 33
Posts 3922
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/23/2012

Re: None

Thursday, 04/28/2016 2:01:21 PM

Thursday, April 28, 2016 2:01:21 PM

Post# of 803565
The Obama administration invoked executive privilege, attorney-client and deliberative process over these documents and insisted that their release would negatively impact global financial markets. But in finally unsealing some of these materials last week, a federal judge named Margaret Sweeney said the government's sole motivation was avoiding embarrassment.

"Instead of harm to the Nation resulting from disclosure, the only 'harm' presented is the potential for criticism," Sweeney wrote. "The court will not condone the misuse of a protective order as a shield to insulate public officials from criticism in the way they execute their public duties."*

So what's so embarrassing? Mainly, it's a sordid history of the government's seizure of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, also known as the government-sponsored enterprises, or GSEs.

''''''

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-is-the-obama-administration-trying-to-keep-11-000-documents-sealed-20160418#ixzz4794zIXNO
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook

My life is risky and funny , that why I am here ! You have your own life and risk . Have fun !!!