HERE IS WHY YOU ARE IN THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME
TO BUY THE BOTTOM OF A DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY ($HCTI) BACKED BY THE EPA :
Current Situation -
Greatly undervalued at current price - price is depressed due to debt accumulation and dilution during Development Phase and early Commercialization/Marketing Phase; Enterprise Value (inclusive of debt) is currently ~$10M and, IMHO, should easily be several 10's of $M
Commercializing, sub-licensing with semi-exclusivity and marketing the isocyanate-free PU product.
Recent contracts include a $4M over 3 years minimum buy agreement with Industrial Finishes and "up to" $20M per annum agreement with Fortune 500 partner
Servicing debt accumulated during the Development Phase and beginning of Commercialization & Marketing Phase - expect multiple accumulation opportunities with price correction plateaus (consolidation) and small pullbacks during dilutive debt-conversion share selling periods as price corrects upward in stair step fashion toward fair market value.
Just beginning to execute contracts and accept revenue-generating orders - current active projects with 5 Fortune 500 companies and developing new relationships with others
"We are the exclusive licensee of Green Polyurethane™ foam, coatings, and adhesives – the world’s first-ever patent protected polyurethane-based foam, coatings, and adhesive products that eliminate toxic isocyanates from the entire production process (licensed by Nanotech Industries, Inc.) and the 2015 recipient of the Presidential Green Chemistry Award by the EPA."
Change begins when solutions are imminent, starting with recommendations and proposals for legislation. Environmental & health protection lobbying gains momentum when off-the-shelf solutions become available. It is reasonable to expect that the EPA, the insurance industry and many others, including special-interest groups, will take steps to avoid a repeat performance of the asbestos debacle - on any scale. With an isocyanate-free solution now becoming available off-the-shelf, it seems reasonable to expect significant change and adoption... especially one that is proven to be cost-effective while offering performance advantages.
And if you are wondering how the rest of the world might act on eliminating isocyanates from the workplace and, further, from consumer products in general, consider the following.
Many who read this will already know that polyurethane has unique properties and offers abilities that are very difficult or costly to achieve with any other solution; and that it is used in many, many products with verticals in the marketplace amounting to $xxx billions of dollars - everything from floor/surface coatings to vehicle paints/coatings to home/building insulation to many consumer products incorporating foam or cushioning materials (e.g. garments, shoes, bedding and mattress materials and much more).
This is just an excerpt from one of many sources of information related to the asbestos debacle in this country:
Quote:
"Known as the miracle mineral, asbestos was used for its resiliency against chemical attack and its excellent tensile strength and superior fire-proofing characteristics. The material was used in 3,000 to 5,000 products from the early 1800s through the 1970s.
Recognizing the effects of asbestos on human health, the U.S. Public Health Service recommended guidelines on asbestos exposure as early as 1938.
Cost is a key factor. The original plan was the establishment of a $108 billion trust fund, the costs for which would be paid by corporations being sued and by insurance companies. Although expensive - $108 billion is a lot of money - corporations and insurance companies were willing to pony up in order to have a set price tag on the asbestos liability monster.
By the time the bill got out of committee, the price tag had ballooned from $108 billion to $153 billion. The insurance industry promptly dropped out, saying the cost had grown so high, it was better off with the status quo."
Here's an excerpt from another source referencing asbestos - it's not difficult to imagine PU iso-cyanates in a similar light in the near future (though likely on a smaller scale):
Quote:
"Besides CERCLA, asbestos is regulated as a solid waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as a building material under the Toxic Substance Control Act, and as an airborne contaminant under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants program in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The agency also limits effluent discharges for asbestos fibers in water under the Clean Water Act.
The immediate costs of the regulations to a company's bottom line should drive a practical and astute CEO to require his or her environmental department heads to find EPA-approved environmental technologies that can eliminate hazardous and regulated wastes releases once and for all. The success of this action would help alleviate the regulatory burden, increase the bottom line, solidify stockholder position and steady stock worth."
...especially when you - or an astute CEO or other party responsible for continuing production or installation of PU for coatings, insulation and/or fabrication of consumer goods.
Expert joins $HCTI Team -
Hybrid Appoints Retired EPA Section Chief to Board of Advisors
Hybrid Appoints Retired EPA Section Chief to Board of Advisors
San Francisco CA, August 27, 2015 -- (MARKET WIRE) – Hybrid Coating Technologies Inc.
(HCTI: OTCBB) is pleased to announce that it has appointed Mary Cushmac to its board of
advisors. Ms. Cushmac who retired from the US EPA in 2011 spent most of her career focusing
on the dangers of isocyanates in the polyurethane industry and was in charge of numerous efforts
to limit the use of isocyanates with the eventual goal of an outright ban (see full bio below). “We
are very happy to add Ms. Cushmac to our board of advisors,” said Joseph Kristul President and
CEO, “Her track record against isocyanates in the polyurethane industry and extensive
experience, brings great expertise to our team and speaks volumes as to the true potential of our
award winning technology.”
Hybrid’s patented technology is the only formulation in the world today that produces
polyurethane without the use of any isocyanates in the entire production process.
About Mary Cushmac
Mary Cushmac has more than 30 years experience at the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency in the Design for the Environment (DfE) and the New Chemicals programs in the
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. From 1997 until her retirement in 2011, she worked
in partnership with the collision repair industry and career/technical schools to develop and
promote best practices to reduce exposure to isocyanates during spray painting and related
operations. Isocyanates – key chemicals in automotive and industrial coatings – are reported to
be the leading cause of occupational asthma.
Ms. Cushmac played a major role in establishing and leading the Federal Spray Polyurethane
Foam Workgroup with participation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the Agency for
Toxic Substances Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC). This work group initiated dialog with the Spray Polyurethane Foam Alliance (SPFA),
the American Chemistry Council (ACC) Center for Polyurethanes Industry (CPI), and the
polyurethane foam industry to promote health and safety best practices that reduce isocyanate
exposures in spray polyurethane foamapplications.
Ms. Cushmac was also a member of the advisory panel created to advise the North Carolina
Division of Public Health and ATSDR on local communications issues related to the 2007-2010
public health study regarding isocyanate (TDI) emissions from a polyurethane plant in North
Carolina.
Ms. Cushmac joined EPA in 1980, serving as the New Chemicals Pre-notice Coordinator and
later as a section chief. She chaired the work group that developed the TSCA Pre-manufacture
Notification Rule Amendments published in 1995, and co-chaired the New Chemicals
Program's Environmental Technology Initiative that developed the 1994 Automotive
Refinishing Industry Isocyanate Profile, which outlines health and safety information on
isocyanates and recommends engineering controls and protective equipment to reduce
inhalation and dermal exposures.
Ms. Cushmac co-authored a discussion of the hazards associated with isocyanate
exposures, best workplace practices, and safer alternatives in a section of the Handbook of
Green Chemistry, Green Processes, Designing Safer Chemicals, published in 2014.
Prior to joining EPA, Ms. Cushmac worked as a research chemist in food chemistry at the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration and published several articles on analytical methods for
detecting toxins in food.
Ms. Cushmac received her undergraduate degree in chemistry at Trinity College in
Washington, D.C. and a Master's degree in organic chemistry at the Catholic University of
America in Washington,D.C. She is a member of the American Chemical Society.
