Thanks for the link DD. A couple quick things as I read this.
1. This patent only covers Cadmium dots, not Cd-free. Does QMC have a patent on tetrapod, Cd-free dots?
2. It's interesting that this patent references an earlier one, US6855202 B2, which was granted to the University of Cal and Dr. Alivisatos. That patent was granted in 2005, well before the ones that Nanosys has brought up in their lawsuit. If tetrapods were applicable for displays, wouldn't Nanosys (the company Alivisatos co-founded) have most likely licensed tetrapod tech when they licensed other tech from Cal? Just a thought. Tetrapod dots no doubt might have advantages, but we've yet to see them in displays.