Liquidation_Assets vs. Market_Value vs. Going-Concern_Value
An ongoing operation has the ability to continue to earn profit, while a liquidated company does not, and market value is just outstanding shares multiplied by share price.
$BRWC has annual sales conservatively estimated at $2M $ 1,498,965 in assets And, the ability to continue to earn profit.
As per the last FORM 10-Q May 13, 2015 and the debt retirement 8k Total assets $ 3,003,807 Total current liabilities $ 2,343,075 - $ 838,232.77 = $ 1,504,842.23
So basically, if we strip away all going concern features, intangibles, and future sales, and just auction off the bare assets we would at a minimum be at 0.00035 per share.
However, $BRWC is worth more than the sum of it's parts. In the valuations, is nothing concerning the ongoing value of the water rights that Boreal holds for the next 50 years and all the sales that would occur out of such rights.
And... Regardless of what is known about sales; there are indeed many sales occuring through:
FRED WAT-AAH! Saks Fifth Avenue Dean and Deluca 80 Vanguard stores in China And many more UAE? - could be huge
DEFINITION of 'Going-Concern Value' http://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/going_concern_value.asp ; ; ; The value of a company as an ongoing entity. This value differs from the value of a liquidated company's assets, because an ongoing operationhas the ability to continue to earn profit, while a liquidated company does not.BRWC IS H20 GOLD
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.