Market makers did not shut down KEYO trading. That is nonsense and don't understand the point of making that up. What is to be gained by changing the stated reason?
Who is making things up here? The below shows who is making things up and it's not them and I'm only reporting the facts.
FINRA tells us right there, point blank that the market makers shut down trading. And in KEYO's case the MM's stated to FINRA it was because the company is dissolved. They lied because Keyon's status w/ the DE SOS is not CANCELLED, which if it were would signify Keyon being fully dissolved. You even pulled it up and showed us that Keyon's status w/ the DE SOS is DISSOLVED, therefore, still in the middle of the dissolution period. Thereby, making Keyon still a legally existing company called a non-trading, non-reporting public shell that can be used in a RTM
Market makers did not shut down KEYO trading. That is nonsense and don't understand the point of making that up.
So, if the above sourced authorities state that it takes a market maker to sponsor a company to trade on the OTCBB and it takes a market maker to remove a company from trading on the OTCBB, and you stated that made up nonsense, then tell us...
HOW EXACTLY DOES A COMPANY STOP TRADING ON THE OTCBB?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.