Actually, the way I read the Tweet is that the company can't figure out some of the two-faced chatter. Great company, great DD, yet constantly slammed when things don't happen yesterday, or haven't you run a public company Dave? I think its actually running 2 businesses in one - you have the business side, and you have the street side. Are your company's public? It may feel like disdain to those who feel as I do, because you can't claim to be a company advocate, yet come here and raise every single negative nuance, quite frankly, as you have. Its obvious to most of us that you will have to join the board of directors in order for you to know ever fact you claim should be disclosed. I beg to differ. Almost every other public company does not get as granular as this one does with its shareholders. Thats just a simple fact. If there is something you don't understand, its been said numerous times to call the CEO.
In fact Dave, I mentioned you to her the other day, and she said if he has any questions, to call me instead of speculating, because his speculation has been interpreted wrongly. If he really wants answers, I am a phone call away. Her exact words. So now you have the CEO saying to you for you to call her instead of first posting up your questions here. So, here is where the problem is.......you, among others, assumed the company (or its lawyers) made a mistake with regard to the pending Kodiak case - never thinking I could be someone else that made a mistake. An administrative mistake does not need to be disclosed unless its final and effects the company negatively, which it didn't, nor does it seem to be a mistake made by the company. But the very first reaction on this board was the company made a mistake, and in your words (with regard to other issues), should admit to its mistakes.
I assume you like the company, but disagree with how they do things. And thats fine and everyone is entitled to their own thought processes, but if you disagree so much (which you do, let's face that) then why buy its stock and stay around. If they keep making mistakes that "dilute" other shareholders, (which is just a perception when you don't look at all the facts) you are simply throwing them in with most other OTC companies, so again, why stay if the ultimate goal is for the insiders to screw the shareholders. I think you actually see whats happening, hence your refusal to leave because you see an opportunity here to make money, as do others including myself.
How about before you continue your cat and mouse game here, you call the CEO to get the real answers instead of speculating, even though thats a lot of fun.
