InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1023
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/11/2015

Re: rolvram post# 21111

Friday, 04/01/2016 7:57:56 AM

Friday, April 01, 2016 7:57:56 AM

Post# of 46772
100 million is based off what? Your numbers seem very low for a trial.

1. ATVI has made billions (at least on the revenue line) off this technology

2. How many years infringement?

3. What is your royalty rate?

4. What is the term of the patents?

5. What about wilful?

Sorry don't mean to be rude here but just saying $100 mil with no backup is the same as me saying $80 billion- its pointless

The reason I posted my questions for a FACTUAL and DATA driven discussion not more "I just feel like it should be x" discussions

The way we should think about this is as I laid out prior (questions) which lead us to fact based numbers. ATVI revenues, term of patents, life of patents we can claim, fair royalty rates if patents haven't expired etc. That leads us to then discount those values based on, time, negotiation, appeal risk etc.

I don't disagree with your commentary on all the risk, 100% aligned with that, but my point is I am trying to understand what is a realistic scenario on court awarded damages if we get through the PTAB as I mentioned in the prior post.

I can guarantee, the value is much greater than $100 mil if so, but part of getting to that realistic value is the diligence I suggested prior.

That being said, I would be happy to see your responses and how you backed into that value (what revenues, term, royalty, etc) you used) to assess their validity. Certainly, if that value is based on the type of diligence I mentioned it would be helpful to the conversation. If not, well its not really based in anything other than a guess, and that wasn't the purpose of my post!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent WDDD News