That's a unique interpretation of what I posted, Buzz! You've added a lot of new content to it! <G>
Yes, I own the stock. (that's what was meant by my comment regarding not parting with my core position) I made no comment about the success of anything nor did I address anything about the amount or velocity of the share price. I'm not sure where that interpretation came from. I did suggest that I might take advantage of "overreactions" to a disappointing PR. I also made a guess that a re-up with DMRJ was likely but offered no opinion about terms (other than to mention the obvious possibilities that they could be similar, better, or worse with an emphasis that "none of us know").
Here's the posting again for your convenience. I hope re-reading it will answer your questions about "my guess".
"I think that a lot of speculative discussion on this and other forums morph into "presumed fact" with their continued repetition. I also believe that's why there is often times a negative overreaction when PRs are released. The actual announcement doesn't conform to the "presumed fact" and shareholders are disappointed due to embellished expectations.
I posted several weeks ago that I anticipate a tradable event when they PR their new financial arrangement. I don't anticipate a sale or partnership to be immediately forthcoming and I suspect there will be an overreaction to that news. Many here have been "conditioned" to expect far more than just a re-up with DMRJ ... with perhaps similar, better, or worse terms. The truth is that none of us know. However, we are all confident in our "guesses" and we're anticipating and, in some cases, already acting according to those guesses.
I truly hope that whatever the news might be, that the share price skyrockets. If it doesn't, I will consider other options which don't yet include parting with my core shares but may again involve picking up trading shares to exploit potential "overreaction" to the news. "
Pat
