Intel Corp (INTC)

[chipguy]

Don't you think there should be some accountability? Shouldn't there be some rules here? If a reviewer is chronically and egregiously wrong in facts used to attack the company, shouldn't he be counterattacked?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

A pissant reviewer seen by maybe thousands is a grain of sand on a wind
swept beach. The fact that this grain of sand seems to always get blown
into your particular eye is neither here nor there.

If Intel ever did anything as stupid as sue this grain of sand it would give
it a public stage and attention a thousand times greater than if it stripped
naked in Times Square and set itself on fire. This attention would give this
grain of sand's attacks a thousand times more weight because it got mighty
Intel upset about it enough to sue.

In the greater scheme of things even this post is more attention that the
grain of sand in question deserves.