InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 94
Posts 15732
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/04/2003

Re: olddog967 post# 11167

Thursday, 03/24/2016 6:39:51 AM

Thursday, March 24, 2016 6:39:51 AM

Post# of 11305
olddog


According to your assumptions on LG must not have owed IDCC a thing

for the use of 3G, then why did IDCC win the arbitration in fact

why did IDCC seek to get paid for 3G? Now when IDCC won and even

sought legal fees from the U.S. courts. If all IDCC won was a right

to go to court they had that right from any day as anyone can sue

anyone any time. No sane person would declare what was a win in the

arbitration that only allowed you to sue them if necessary would

ever make a statement that LG 3G was concluded and behind them.

Those words are clear to me there is nothing more to be litigated

that the LG 3G dispute was concluded and behind them. Further

litigation would be a long way from concluded and behind them.

You would tell the shareholders we won the no arbitration but you

would never declare LG 3G is concluded and behind us. If they go

to court I personally will spend my money to sue Merritt for

misrepresenting the LG 3G dispute.


JMO
Mickey

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.