InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 112
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2010

Re: gitreal post# 161338

Monday, 03/21/2016 5:45:51 PM

Monday, March 21, 2016 5:45:51 PM

Post# of 173202
James Brisco has always stated in his reports that according to his geologic interpretation of the are, - the Hay Mountain porphyry lay under a basin filled formation. It was always presumed that the porphyry was underlain by a thick sequence of Paleozoic quartzite, limestones and silt stones. Since no previous copper outcroppings were found it was presumed that that the porphyry was buried under a hard layer. The fact that anything at all was found at the surface was a geologic surprise. I don't know how thuriugh a boots on the ground investigation was performed by JB in the past but I believe him when he says he was surprised to find what he found which seems to indicate that the copper has managed to leach out above this hard basin filled layer even if it is just a tiny amount. The Ztem is the main indicator of what lay below the hard layer of rock. JB believed that the Hay Mountain are had been overlooked by previous prospectors because nothing was found on the surface and they could not have known about the buried porphyry. How difficult is that to understand?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LBSR News