InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 8127
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/10/2013

Re: None

Thursday, 03/17/2016 12:51:52 PM

Thursday, March 17, 2016 12:51:52 PM

Post# of 347761
I believe it would be better for all if the company can pay for their expansion by not adding shares. But it is obvious they are having a tough time doing so. They have too many 'ideas' and are not concentrating on one or two products. Whomever is doing the market analysis is guessing and using shares to pay for it.

No one wanted a diet soda with more ingredients than diet soda itself and call it 'sparkling water'

This is business 101. Pick a product or two and perfect it or at least get good traction before starting 10 other products at the same time.

It's that simple SS. You've been here long enough to be an 'investor' and you should understand this.

You should be on the horn with Vanis and such. Not pitching a tent and drawing imaginary lines that do not take into account the increasing float.

I would say if the float and OS was staying the same this would be a different story. But it's not. Because the product is not selling / revenues are not where they are supposed to be.

Period
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.