InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 1237
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2015

Re: thirst20 post# 36129

Tuesday, 03/15/2016 4:44:12 PM

Tuesday, March 15, 2016 4:44:12 PM

Post# of 127559
That is true too.
There's two different ways you can look at INMG.

1.) As a penny at .0001/.0002 that's been there for some time and that now indicates it will RS and a CEO that's silent. A recipe for failure.

2.) As a legitimate company with a solid revenue stream that is developing new entertainment media to add to that revenue stream. Also, as a company with a CEO who has a lot of experience in the entertainment industry having started and ran the Atlantic Entertainment Group from the 70's through the 80's and knows the ins and outs of how to get entertainment produced. In addition, he knows the distribution direction that modern entertainment is moving and is ready to exploit it. As a company that not only has film/video assets but is also expanding those while developing an entertainment search engine akin to a cross between Google and TV Guide.

The reason it's stuck at .0001 is because most of those who have looked in on INMG look at it from the standpoint of number 1 and Tom Coleman is the world's worst communicator of a publicly traded company. Period.

If you look at it from the standpoint of number 2, you're counting on the production and revenue continuing and eventually it will overpower the negative sentiment of number 1 and our silent CEO. It's just too early in the development of INMG for the pps to reflect the true value of the company when battling against those anchors.

But it will.