If you want to retain members and gain new ones, you have to figure out why people get frustrated trying to trade stocks without constantly having their investments being attacked. When the bashers/ FUD spreaders can ad nauseam make statements against the co. 24/7, no matter whether true or not,
I would say expect some responses to this one...
Pink sheets are gambling, no one should listen to anyone telling them it's an investment.
One thing everyone knows almost without exception is the 'basher' 95% of the time is directly discussing the company, the officers and insider/present and past principals, which are clearly allowed by Ihub. NOT the member posting on the board and a large percent of the time the 'basher' backs it up with links to the SEC, Finra, Pacer as well as other legit sources.
Whereas the 'defending their investment' member, having no ammo or 'facts' to refute actual links to the companies own files of criminal conduct the company created themselves, will attack the 'basher' themselves. Usually followed by "prove they didn't do it" impossible double negative. Take a look at any cult board's ban list. Interestingly, pumpers far outnumber bashers on those lists...why is that?
"make statements against the co. 24/7, NO MATTER WHETHER TRUE OR NOT?????
So, the only statements that should be allowed are all the 'true' ones, usually from the company themselves and repeated ad nauseam, but not the true bad news or info.
That sounds a little one sided and not conductive of Ihubs attempts at fair discourse. There are other sites where one can have their wish. Ihub isn't one of those.