InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 4116
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/08/2005

Re: kanola post# 99646

Monday, 03/14/2016 2:14:59 PM

Monday, March 14, 2016 2:14:59 PM

Post# of 116865

If he believed there was no oil why did he not have the PR corrected to protect his reputation ??? It's only after he was let go did his claim that oil was never present come up.


A. $20,000 a month
B. Wasn't aware of it or had to play along
C. Could care less for $20,000 a month.
D. All of the above.

Both above appear to be immoral individuals. Immoral individuals can't testify under oath, on a witness stand without committing perjury.


LOL! What would Perry Mason do?


And for the dry holes, why did the GOB allow Treaty to continue drilling destroying their country knowing their was no oil ???


How about the GOB had a contract to fulfill with Princess? DOH!

Again, they should be forced to testify but would perjure themselves telling the truth.


Kind of hard to do since Mohamed hasn't testified in court yet. DOH, DOH!!! Now Reid has and he will be facing perjury charges.

And to protect the truth behind the corruption here The SEC will not let that happen


The SEC is the one who brought the suit and collect the affidavits. DOH,DOH, DOH!!!!
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.