InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 38
Posts 5014
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 08/05/2002

Re: doogdilinger post# 15440

Monday, 03/14/2016 10:46:33 AM

Monday, March 14, 2016 10:46:33 AM

Post# of 38634
Agreed Doog,

There is a level of validation that IPCI can handle hard to manufacture candidates. Beyond that though, unless there is a partnership arrangement for one of the ANDAs besides Focalin, they simply won't bring much in terms of a solid increase to market valuation. If they aren't monetized, the validation of the science will pass.

I still do not understand why there hasn't been definitive acknowledgement on the other Focalin strengths submission of bioequivalence. A no brainer. Which to me means it hasn't been done and makes absolutely no sense. The Sedar filngs on say IPCI and PAR "are cooperating to obtain FDA approval". Why not .... bioequivalence has been demonstrated and we are awaiting FDA review ?? Besides Rexista, one would think this top priority.

I also agree the upcoming filing on Rexista is important and hopefully there are no snags in the approval process.

I had hoped the IPCI's new CFO would actually drive the company further towards new partnerships arrangements. Beyond the occasional market purchase and roadshow presentation, haven't seen much.

Amigo Mike
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y