InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 3019
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/19/2010

Re: flying_trader post# 3518

Sunday, 03/13/2016 5:48:34 PM

Sunday, March 13, 2016 5:48:34 PM

Post# of 6624
FT,

I like your Theory A scenario as we all know it takes a long time to be certified for Aerospace. However, you make a great point with sunk costs, it pure economics.
It is one thing if a company is building a brand new plant to manufacture a new engine versus using an existing plant for the new engine. No manufacturer is going to completely rid there traditional machine centers and replace them with EBM and Laser. It is to cost prohibitive. The traditional machines can produce more than just one type of part.

I see them phasing in EBM blades one-stage at a time and one engine at a time personally and using EBM for replacement blades as well. The cost of buying 30, 40, or 50 machines at one time is way to expensive, even if YOU are GE! and especially if you are a Supplier!
Maybe over the next 5-7 years as machines are faster and powder is cheaper we will see LPT Blades in all GE engines produced by EBM......All IMHO

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.