InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 444
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/22/2006

Re: None

Saturday, 03/12/2016 10:18:15 AM

Saturday, March 12, 2016 10:18:15 AM

Post# of 346043
I so much want, "the nothing has changed" proponents to be correct. But I cannot afford false hope. I think that I'm probably not alone in that quandary. As I stated after the debacle was announced, I will not sell a share and fully expect to go down with the SS Peregrine.

Our hope, at the moment, seems to be centered on Dr. Garnick evaluating the data and, if there has again been a finagling with the data, he will know exactly who to run to in the FDA. As I have said, one of the main reasons why I stuck with PPHM was Dr. Garnick. But it occurs to me to ask: should not have Dr. Garnick, with all of his history with bringing drugs successfully through testing, also have been aware of the possible pitfalls and good 'Ol Boy shenanigans (BP and FDA corruption) which, according to some of the bulls here, have been not uncommonly fatal to small biotechs? Given the assumed revolutionary biologic that we have in Bavi, why wasn't Garnick and the company much more vigilant (especially after the disaster of PII)?

How does one explain this? Garnick overseeing the collapse of Phase II and III trials back to back, given his previous track record, truly puzzles me.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News