Demand Brands Inc. (DMAN)

[JonnyBGood]

Stop what mike? I'm giving legitimate reasons that if Tom feels the need to rs to accomplish the business plan, that it's within the realm of possibility and in all likelihood that the rs, if he chooses to rs, would be a success. I'm going by what's actually in the 10-K. What are you going on when you say no rs? A supposed call to Tom that nobody witnessed nor can we verify? Are you trying to save INMG by telling us flat out denials of what's in print in the annual report, hoping that the elephant in the room will disappear???

You know why everyone's selling mike? Because of that statement in the 10-K about the rs. 9 times out of 10 there is one eventuality when a company reverse splits. A death spiral. If it were 10 times out of 10 I'd be out too, but it's not. Some companies, based on their revenue generation can benefit from an rs. Quite frankly, it doesn't lend credibility to you when you say that it was a misprint. That makes you out to be a wishful thinker hoping everything will be okay. A misprint??? Really? That makes Tom out to be incompetent. That's what you're implying and Tom's no idiot, he's fully capable of putting together an accurate 10-K or else he's got no business being the CEO. Every word of that 10-K was carefully thought out.

I still say that INMG is a solid company with a good business plan and good revenue generation that's only going to get better. But that's based on solid DD. What else is there to go on?