InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 87
Posts 6812
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/18/2009

Re: shajandr post# 345926

Friday, 03/11/2016 12:40:47 PM

Friday, March 11, 2016 12:40:47 PM

Post# of 346918
"LOL! Of course, because the shares Moskowitz and Metter had planned to deliver as UNRESTRICTED shares for delivery were illegal and could nott be delivered to the buyers - because that would be fraud.

There were ILLEGAL unregistered shares in the FLOAT!"


My Dec 2011 Report of Examination noted the following:

"Pensley's Objection claimed that shares were being diverted to a close corporation. As I recall the SEC Complaint documentation, it referred to both Diomede and Maremmano as close corporations. These companies, according to the WST Transaction Journal, share the same Panama City address as do Ardee Trading Company and Fribourg Enterprises, at 10 Elvira Mendez Street."

Based on my selection of your comments and my comments, it may not seem like it, but we are actually referencing the same thing. And there is Regulatory substantiation that supports what we say, to include charges having been filed.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.